Monday, October 24, 2016

Responding to Questions about Article Critiques


1.  Did you say TV is the least likely to be part of multitasking? Is that true for TV as both the primary and secondary media? (I.e., I almost always do something else while watching TV, but I rarely watch TV while I’m doing something else.)

It is true that, according to the study result of Foehr, TV is least likely to be multitasked with another medium. As it shows below, only 17% of respondents’ media multitasking time has television involved, either as primary or secondary media. Honestly, the researcher found the survey result of television is surprising too. 

They analyzed the parings of media multitasking regardless of whether the media were primary or secondary activities. It is reasonable to think that TV is seldom used as secondary media, which accounts for the low percentage of its time used with another medium. I think it’s better to make a distinction of TV between being primary or secondary to study it in different scenario, because the researcher in this study did not expect such outcome of television.

2.         Do you have any suggestion for young people on multitasking?

The most reason why I think this is a good study because the author gave broader implications expect his illustration and discussion of the statistical result, which concerns about young people’s behaviors, psychological and neurological changes during media multitasking, also some predictions and suggestions for them.

From my view, I do have suggestions for young people on media multitasking. Since more and more young people become multitaskers, they should better know whether their working efficiency has been improved or not and what is the best way for them to multitask. For example, do I really finish my homework better with the help of computer and instant message at the same time? Do I get along well better with writing emails and reading online than texting message while reading online. Make stop in time if you find yourself not being capable of doing too much multitasking.


3.  Thinking about multitasking, does using a laptop in a classroom setting / learning environment facilitate learning? Or does it hinder learning?

Actually in this research, the researcher didn’t cover the analysis of using laptop in classroom, considering that it was published in 2006. I do think now laptop using in classroom is very important for studying multitasking for education. I think there is no definite answer to decide whether it is helpful or harmful to use laptop in classroom, it really depends on how much time and how you multitask.

The author also brought up an idea in the study that “we cannot process simultaneously multiple non-related messages.” It means the brain only responds when multiple information on different medium are relative, other wise we cannot process. Thinking about using laptop during class, if we use laptop to take notes, search relevant information simultaneously, our brain can process these messages and thus facilitates out studying process. On the contrary, if we use laptop for irrelevant activities during the class, our brains decline to get the information therefore do harm to our studying efficiency.

Monday, October 3, 2016

Understanding behaviors in virtual world from psychological perspective, where should we head for?



I believe that people who actively participate in virtual community activities nowadays are aware of the great difference between online self and real self, the one you create and present as you want and the one you are really like in real life. Sherry Turkle’s TED talk, even was in 2012, really pointed out the current worrying situation that “people are being alone together”. I did remind me of so many familiar scenes taking place in real life where teenagers are obsessed with video games and become more rebellious against parents, people still find loneliness when they have many online friends, people who develop psychological disorders and are not able to deal with real lives. Situations are completely different and more complicated than the time when we are celebrating and embracing the fantastic new life online.

The idea that I support most is the psychological motivation that shape and decide people’s engagement in virtual community. I think what people say and do online is driven by psychological needs and wants. With larger scale of virtual online activities, some people’s obsession with this unreal dream cause endless psychological desire to interacted with the unreal self in online community. Here I would like to mention an ongoing phenomenon online.

As social media take large part of people’s life, some people find it fascination to share their good life and receive good comments by faking themselves as almost perfect. They take pretty pictures with photoshop and got millions of followers online, which satisfy their vanity which they don’t have in real life. This seemingly beautiful experience being under the spotlight lure so many people to recreate their images in virtual world. It eve gave rise to an occupation in China, which we call “online celebrities”. People paid any price to do plastic surgery just to be looked pretty in pictures, or some just live on photoshop. They beautiful images they show on social networks to their fans soon become like their real life. However, after their psychological desire is satisfied, this causes other serious psychological problem: they can no longer accept the self who they really are. As I read in news, some “online celebrities” died in plastic surgery to be more beautiful on their facebook, some had MDD when they find themselves are not beautiful in front of the mirror, some live always in fear that others may find out their secrets. All these psychological desires, motivations and depression create a circle chain that distort their normal life and force them to live forever with masks.







Personally, I find this kind of life is horrible when you feel you have to create lies to cover your lies, and have real happiness from real life. “We expect more from technology and less from each other”, says Sherry, because virtual world meets our vanity and provides us a utopia of all perfect things. When we get used to the perfection online, we no longer want a real talk, real friend, even real love. When we become afraid to real conversation and real life, when our expectation fail, technology may lead to very dangerous consequence.  

However, psychological problems are always hard to cure, so as the powerful influence of virtual life created by internet technology. It true that when we firstly invented and introduced the fabulous technology into our lives, no one predicted the consequences today. Now as we study more about online behaviors and connect it into psychological field, we should head our way to conduct people to understanding critically about the foam and illusion world in online world and avoid to be controlled by it.